I consider myself to be an advocate for branch campuses. At their best, branches create access and
opportunity for individuals and contribute to the economic development of the
communities they serve. In Out on a Limb: A Branch Campus Life I go into much more
detail about why branches matter, but for present purposes the key point is
that branches serve an audience that is different than the audiences served by
a traditional main campus or by a fully online program. There are excellent opportunities for
campuses and programs to partner in multiple ways, but it is a mistake to
overlook the differences.
Institutional leaders certainly recognize that the world of higher
education is much more complicated and more competitive than it was just a few
years ago. Count me among those who believe
that the financial/business models are broken, and the impact of technology has
forever changed delivery options in ways that are exciting but also increase risk. In my opinion, despite recognizing the
issues, most leaders remain stuck in frames and practices that are unlikely to
be effective in this “new world,” but that’s a story for another day.
The last few chapters of Out on
a Limb are more explicitly strategic about the conditions that allow branch
campuses to thrive and the likely challenges they will face in the future. There
are outstanding opportunities, but institutions need a comprehensive strategy
that includes distinctive approaches for their traditional audience, for online
programs, and for their satellite operations.
For branch campuses, I believe the greatest threat to growth occurs
when the main campus attempts to control too many decisions that are better
made locally, in the mistaken belief that they understand the branch audience
or that they need to guard against branch campuses somehow undermining the
institutional brand. Prospective branch
students are not the same as main campus prospects, and their priorities are
quite different.
Specifically, I believe that course scheduling, marketing/recruitment,
and those support services that are directly visible to students should be
administered locally, whereas those that are more of the “backroom” sort, such
as financial aid needs assessment, registrar, and bursar functions can most
efficiently be centralized at the main campus.
Any given institution may vary somewhat from the ideal, but enrollment
success depends on connecting effectively with the audience.
Failure to appreciate the perspectives and priorities of different
audiences is a serious mistake. For both
online and branch programs it is important to give them enough independence to
avoid getting trapped by the demands of the “production engine” (see
Govindarajan and Trimble, 2010, The Other
Side of Innovation), which will try to rein in anything that is truly innovative,
simply because the established academic and administrative units will view that
innovation as a distraction, perhaps as a threat, and for sure as inferior to
their own efforts on behalf of the institution.
It isn’t easy to support entrepreneurship in an established
organization, but those who thrive in the future will figure out how to make it
happen.
Out on a Limb: A Branch Campus Life is available in print
and Kindle versions on amazon.com. I
hope you will check it out.